Before you share, check the photo.

A news image can look urgent, documentary, and ready to forward — and still never have been taken. Get a read first.

Same street scene twice: a real documentary photo on the left, a too-perfect AI news render on the right.

Left: a frame that was taken. Right: a scene that was made. Same mood. Very different proof.

Looking like evidence is not the same as being evidence.

News travels as pictures. A crowd, a blast, a handshake, a flooded street — one frame can outrun the caption that explains it.

AI made it cheap to invent “proof”: documentary lighting, urgent composition, faces that almost hold. Some of those images document real events. Some invent the event. Your eyes alone are a soft filter.

True Byline is for the pause between “this looks real” and “I will share it” — a read on whether the photo looks like a camera shot or something generated.

Anywhere a picture is treated as proof.

You do not need a disinformation unit. You need a habit: when a photo is why you believe or forward — check the photo.

Breaking posts

Urgent frames that hit feeds before context, sourcing, or a byline catch up.

Tips & inboxes

Images sent privately as “proof” — screenshots, WhatsApp forwards, tip lines.

Story embeds

Hero shots and pull quotes that look wire-ready and still need a second look.

Research packs

Slide decks and briefings where one clean photo carries the whole claim.

A journalist desk with a laptop news story, phone tip, and printed clippings.

Soft clues, not a verdict.

None of these prove a fake on their own. Together, they are a reason to slow down — and to run a check.

  1. Too-perfect chaos Crowds, smoke, weather — dramatic, but composed like a still from a trailer.
  2. Place that will not hold Signs, skylines, landmarks — almost a city you know, then wrong on the second look.
  3. Caption vs frame The text claims a time or place the pixels cannot support.
  4. Speed without source Brand-new image, no original, pressure to forward before anyone verifies.

Three steps between doubt and a decision.

True Byline does not replace editorial judgement. It gives it something to stand on before a frame travels.

1

You see a photo treated as proof

A tip, a feed post, a story embed — urgent, clean, ready to share.

2

You check the image

True Byline reads the photo and scores how likely it is a camera shot versus AI-generated.

3

You share — or you hold

Use the result before you forward, cite, or publish. A strong signal — not a legal verdict.

We never keep the photo.

Newsrooms and researchers already handle sensitive material. A check should not mean filing that frame into a permanent archive.

True Byline is built as a read: you bring the image, you get a result, we do not keep the photo. Details live on the privacy page.

A read you can use today.

Free accounts get more daily checks than browsing signed out. Paid plans stretch to thirty a day when you are vetting tips and story art in batches.

Unused checks do not roll over. Midnight UTC resets the jar. Simple on purpose.

News photos and AI.

Can news photos be AI-generated?

Yes. Generated images can look like documentary proof — crowds, disasters, politicians, crime scenes — and still never have been taken.

How does True Byline help before I share?

You get a read on whether the photo looks like a real camera shot or AI-generated — so you can pause before you forward, cite, or publish.

Is a “likely AI” result proof a story is false?

No. It is a signal, not a courtroom verdict. Stack it with sourcing, reverse search, and editorial judgement.

What kinds of news images can I check?

Story photos, tip images, wire-style frames, social screenshots forwarded as news — any still image you are about to treat as proof.

Do you keep the news photo?

No. Checks run without keeping the photo on our side.

Check the photo. Then decide.

If a picture is asking to be treated as evidence, treat it like evidence. True Byline gives you a read — in the browser, without keeping the file.

Other moments worth a check.